![]() The opinionsof eight experts were evaluated using Kendall W analysis, which revealed that there was no statisticaldifference (Kendall W=0.13) among their opinions and that their scores were consistentwith each other. ![]() Results: The expert evaluation showed a content validity index was 0.99. Material and Methods: For this tool, languageequivalence was examined using translation-back translation method, content validity wasevaluated by consulting expert opinion, and reliability was determined depending on inter-rater reliability.The researchers used a content validity index to evaluate the expert opinion and also usingCohen’s Kappa. This study aimed to examine the qualityof quantitative studies and to conduct validity and reliability studies of the Turkish translation ofthe Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. ![]() Objective: One of the main problems for the validity of meta-analytical studies is qualityassessment of studies to be included in meta-analysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |